Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the panoramic domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Sewing Single-Welt Pockets https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets 19th Century Costuming for Those Who Dream of the Past Fri, 10 May 2019 11:35:48 +0000 hourly 1 By: Waistcoats (2013 and onwards) – Kari's Craft Space https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-255895 Fri, 10 May 2019 11:35:48 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-255895 […] This was my first waistcoat, for my son, and I think I made it by drawing around a bought one we had. I googled how to do pockets, and found a tutorial that was really good. I can’t seem to find it now. This wasn’t the one, but looks quite good – https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets […]

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-242810 Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:05:48 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-242810 In reply to Maureeen B.

I’ve not heard of a “self welt” pocket. Is the rectangle welt part cut in one with the garment piece?

]]>
By: Maureeen B https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-242795 Thu, 31 May 2018 16:58:55 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-242795 Love this tute. I’m putting in pockets in a boys vest and this is so helpful. Even the same size I need. BTW, what are your thoughts on a self welt pocket. One piece method with just the pocket backing. What would be the difference. in the final outcome (not considering historical methods)? I saw both, the self welt seems easier, but I can’t really see too much difference in the final outcomes on my try outs. Thoughts?

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-240629 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:32:27 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-240629 In reply to Prerna chaudhary.

You are welcome! Happy to hear it helped you with sewing the pocket.

]]>
By: Prerna chaudhary https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-240618 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:51:53 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-240618 Thank you so much for this easy tutorial….because of this tutorial I was able to sew welt pocket to my dad’s kurta so perfectly without having any prior experience of stitching pockets…thanks a lot…

]]>
By: Cathy Adams https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-201924 Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:04:24 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-201924 By far the best single welt pocket example I have seen. This example was very helpful. Thank you for taking the time to put this online.

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-194678 Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:46:36 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-194678 In reply to ruth franzen.

You are most welcome Ruth. Welcome to our Joyful Community! 🙂

]]>
By: ruth franzen https://historicalsewing.com/sewing-single-welt-pockets/comment-page-1#comment-194630 Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:16:48 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=7237#comment-194630 Thank you so much for your instructions and photos…honest to Pete, I was about to rip my hair out trying to follow the directions to make an 1880 era vest for my husband. I found your site and was able to finally (finally!!) make the welt pockets. Thank-you, thank-you…

]]>