Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the panoramic domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Flatlining 19th Century Sleeves https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves 19th Century Costuming for Those Who Dream of the Past Mon, 15 Jan 2024 23:34:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-268427 Mon, 15 Jan 2024 23:34:32 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-268427 In reply to Seth Rossman.

Tailored jacket sleeves are fullly interfaced and lined. The interfacing historically is horsehair, but there are modern wool (faux and real) interfacings that are purposely for tailoring. One must be careful with fusible interfacing, and I don’t particularly recommend it for historical fashions. Sew-in is the way to go! But a frockcoat shouldn’t have sleeves that “drape.” They need to be shaped and the inner layers help with that.

]]>
By: Seth Rossman https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-268414 Sun, 14 Jan 2024 17:21:55 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-268414 On the male side of things in the late (1880-1890) Victorian period, what about frockcoat sleeves. laughing Moon (109) has pattern pieces and specs for actually interfacing sleeves. Never heard of such a thing!
I could see a muslin or light dupioni interlining, but their call for full IF (let alone fusible!) seems as if it would cause creases instead of drape.
Even a short sleeved muslin interlining at the cap makes sense.

??

]]>
By: Linings & Underlinings – Do You Really Need Both? – Historical Sewing https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-259930 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:00:34 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-259930 […] Flatlining sleeves […]

]]>
By: Podcast 003: Organdy Fabric Basics https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-248482 Tue, 02 Oct 2018 23:38:17 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-248482 […] –Flatlining large sleeves blog post […]

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-229182 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 15:27:03 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-229182 In reply to Anna Cunningham.

That is indeed my chemise sleeve visible under the sheer white windowpane fabric of the Regency dress. The dress itself is fully un-lined – no underlining fabric at all even on the bodice.

(And don’t worry, this sleeve article is much newer than the bodice and skirt flatlining posts. You didn’t bypass it – I hadn’t published it yet! 😉 )

]]>
By: Anna Cunningham https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-229161 Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:13:23 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-229161 This was so useful and I’m shocked that, despite having read your articles on flatlining bodices and skirts, I’d managed to bypass this one until it was posted by someone on the Historical Pattern Review page on Facebook. I wish I’d read it before I made my 1890s ballgown, as I foolishly decided to skip flatlining on the grounds that I didn’t want TOO stiff and exaggerated a silhouette… ha ha!
I’ve now gone back and amended my mistake.
I notice one thing that makes me curious: in the picture of the Regency dress, there clearly is something underneath the sheer sleeve of dress itself. Is that the sleeve of the chemise? I’d prefer the look without that sleeve showing, but I suppose that’s how people’s dresses looked then.

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-228545 Wed, 17 May 2017 19:33:03 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-228545 In reply to debbie watson.

The fitted stay is like a short sleeve that basically goes around your upper arm and is the cap length you want. Then you gather up the puff to fit the stay sleeve at the top and bottom, baste, and set into the armhole. You can add netting or other stuffing between the puff and stay to help hold the puff out in its shape. It’s so you don’t have your arm simple sitting inside the huge puff; it’s controlled by the stay. Hope this helps.

]]>
By: debbie watson https://historicalsewing.com/flatlining-19th-century-sleeves/comment-page-1#comment-228540 Wed, 17 May 2017 17:41:45 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=10657#comment-228540 What does “If you have an upper puff cut on the bias, you can mount it to a fitted stay cut on the grain” mean? Particularly, ‘the fitted stay cut’ . I’m not familiar with that, I think.

]]>