Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the panoramic domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Fabrics to Make Pretty Petticoats https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats 19th Century Costuming for Those Who Dream of the Past Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:57:43 +0000 hourly 1 By: Sarah https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-261504 Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:57:43 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-261504 Bright red brushed cotton for the winter and white lawn for the summer. I don’t do the frilly thing beyond what is necessary as I simply can’t be bothering with the extra ironing /shudder.

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-261356 Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:33:47 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-261356 In reply to Jane Hook.

Chintz IS polished cotton with a print. Other polished cotton (hard to find these days) is generally in solid colors.

]]>
By: Jane Hook https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-261355 Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:47:45 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-261355 In reply to Jennifer Rosbrugh.

Is chintz what you call polished cotton?

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-260110 Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:08:07 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-260110 In reply to THG.

So glad to help you further! Yes, ruffles can be for the silhouette as well as your personal aesthetic (not everyone likes them). I’ve found home decor drapery lining to be close to polished cotton. You might check local home fabric departments for something that could be used. Be sure to pay attention to the weight; home fabrics tend to be thicker and/or heavier than apparel fabrics. Good luck going forward!

]]>
By: THG https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-260102 Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:19:20 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-260102 In reply to Jennifer Rosbrugh.

Aha! Starch it is, then. Thank you! Knowing me, I’ll be trying the historical starch recipes, risks and all! I’m glad to know that ruffles are not necessary per se, unless actually required by the silhouette (they look awfully fun to make, and they look splendid on other people, but aren’t a stylistic which I personally gravitate towards very often). Polished cotton – so it is a bit of a challenge for everyone to source? – I confess, i’ve been trying and trying to find it in (continental) Europe, and haven’t had any success at all. Frustrating…. I kept thinking that I just don’t know the local terms, but perhaps it is actually not available. In any case, again, thank you so much for your very helpful answer – and, for that matter, your hugely informative website!

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-260044 Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:19:12 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-260044 In reply to THG.

The key is to starch the petticoats (related post link). I recommend dip starching (fully submerged and not the spray kind) for best effect. After pressing a starched cotton petticoat a smooth, papery finish appears which helps the skirt or other petticoats, along with the undergarments, to not get “stuck” to the petticoat. Another solution would be to make the petticoat in a polished cotton, but that fabric isn’t as easy to find nowadays and the modern textile is heavier than was used in the 19th century.

]]>
By: THG https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-260043 Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:19:22 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-260043 May I ask a question about the practicalities of petticoats and the necessity of ruffles? To be clear, I have not yet tried my hand at a period-correct petticoat pattern, but any attempt to layer a plain long cotton skirt (quilting cotton) under similarly cut outer skirts has inevitably resulted in the quasi-petticoat climbing my legs and tying itself in jolly knots around my knees, unless I have bare legs. That being…not quite the idea…. does this happen with proper petticoats? Is it the lack the weight of a flounce or other decoration at the lower hem which causes the quasi-petticoat to climb? (I have tried it with cotton and wool stockings and various weights of modern microfibre tights with the same results…)

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/fabrics-to-make-pretty-petticoats/comment-page-1#comment-259062 Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:11:33 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=8975#comment-259062 In reply to Johnette Williams.

I would not recommend canvas for petticoats. Horsehair *maybe*, but that’s rough stuff. And honestly, silk is simply fancy for a top petticoat whereas cotton and linen are truly the best in weight and support for the overall silhouette. And I’d encourage you to look again at starching cotton for petticoats. True liquid starch gives a wonderful paper finish to a petticoat that helps dirt brush off easily and keeps the petticoat at its best to support the skirts. You can read more on how to starch in this post.

]]>