Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the panoramic domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Some Things Are Better Left in the Past https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past 19th Century Costuming for Those Who Dream of the Past Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:08:15 +0000 hourly 1 By: Michelle https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-198319 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:08:15 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-198319 I agree with Arnie. I too do westward expansion era clothing, specifically late Victorian prairie/immigrant. Please remember, those old photographs were our ancestors in their Very Best clothing. Most of the women would get a new spring/summer dress or a fall/winter dress. The lucky one might get one for every season. The dress had to be made after your work was done, usually by lamp light. If it was a good season or you had a windfall, you might get to order one from the Sears catalog.

They found pictures of accessories in the women’s magazines that were passed around the entire community only after the original owner was done. A lot of them couldn’t read English or only a very little. The “doily” might have been her best attempt at recreating something she saw. With the busy lives and sheer labour of their daily tasks, kudos to her for even attempting the jabot to “fancy” up her best dress and make it go another season.

I look around my brightly lit sewing room, with my patterns, abundance of trimmings and supplies. Then I look at the portrait of Great Great Aunt Mary in her white lace gown from the early 1900s. I feel so proud of those who came before, dressed themselves and their families, made do or remade. They helped build homes, towns and a country.

Guess it was a long way to say it. I kind like the doily….. on her.

]]>
By: Photographs of Historical Fat People | closetpuritan https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-44570 Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:07:55 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-44570 […] third picture down in this post shows a larger Victorian lady with an unfortunate jabot-doily-thingy. (Unfortunate according to the […]

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-27544 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:23:34 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-27544 In reply to Joan Watkins.

Having documented proof to back up our decisions is the best!

]]>
By: Joan Watkins https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-27540 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:47:42 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-27540 Love your interesting articles, I too find myself justifying what I want to wear by searching for pictures of certain styles. I used to grow my hair bangs (fringe) from January onward for the Llandudno Victorian Extravaganza, until I noticed a famous Money painting with a lady dressed beautifully and with a FRINGE! I am happy now to chop away to my hearts delight with proof , if necessary!

]]>
By: Gail https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-17208 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:31:06 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-17208 In reply to Lady Mellilah.

Neon colored fishtail skirts with chervon patterned off the shoulder blouses on slouched over, bow-legged, pigeon-toes heroin-dosed models with long hair in their faces.
*Sigh*

]]>
By: Gail https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-17206 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:27:23 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-17206 You can only be so accurate to a point. If I’m going to spend tons of time, money & energy on making a historical dress for myself– I’m going to put some accuracy to the side. I mean, I’m the one wearing the dress. I’m planning on taking advantage of my times’ techniques, materials and aesthetics to create a dress that would please me.
Some of the bustle dresses on Pinterest can be almost ugly due to the excessive amount of lace. Back in it’s day, the dress could have been the cat’s pajamas but now I want nothing more than for someone to take the lace off. I know it’s pretty and for the Victorians it was awesome to have lace EVERYWHERE but to me, it really makes a dress look “overdone”.

]]>
By: Lady Mellilah https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-16483 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:31:23 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-16483 I sometimes wonder what historians WILL recreate when they look back at us…what documentation will get lost in a fire or other natural disaster? Which clothes will they see as our norm?

]]>
By: Mireille Weller https://historicalsewing.com/better-left-in-the-past/comment-page-1#comment-16332 Mon, 02 Sep 2013 22:10:32 +0000 http://historicalsewing.com/?p=6825#comment-16332 In reply to Varika.

This company do medieval glasses frames they also work for the Tudor period. Al you have to do is take them to your optomitrist and get the prescription lenses put in.

http://www.medievaldesign.com/english.asp

]]>