Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the panoramic domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home2/katrine/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Element #3 – Pattern, Tools & Notions https://historicalsewing.com 19th Century Costuming for Those Who Dream of the Past Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:23:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/5-elements/element-3-pattern-tools-notions/comment-page-1#comment-254657 Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:23:19 +0000 http://www.historicalsewing.com#comment-254657 In reply to Kathleen Gohn.

No closing but overlap and tiny button or tie at the top is also historically appropriate. No need to do all the buttons unless you want to.

]]>
By: Kathleen Gohn https://historicalsewing.com/5-elements/element-3-pattern-tools-notions/comment-page-1#comment-254646 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:15:26 +0000 http://www.historicalsewing.com#comment-254646 In reply to Jennifer Rosbrugh.

Thanks! I thought the other question didn’t post, which is why I repeated here… and now I can’t even find your blog to read the response there. I am so not good with computers! I could do mother-of-pearl but having looked at some of your Pinterest chemisette images, I’m thinking maybe no closing is needed, other than an invisible hook and eye at the top under the ruffle, and maybe another hook at the bottom. There’s some overlap, and I could even do a pin if needed.

]]>
By: Jennifer Rosbrugh https://historicalsewing.com/5-elements/element-3-pattern-tools-notions/comment-page-1#comment-254626 Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:04 +0000 http://www.historicalsewing.com#comment-254626 In reply to Kathleen gohn.

Hi Kathleen, I replied to your similar comment on the other blog post. Here it is: Shell or wood buttons would be better as the chemisette is more of an undergarment. Mother-of-pearl are also great. However, you could do fabric covered, but keep the size small.

]]>
By: Kathleen gohn https://historicalsewing.com/5-elements/element-3-pattern-tools-notions/comment-page-1#comment-254615 Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:19:41 +0000 http://www.historicalsewing.com#comment-254615 I’m finishing a chemisette [La Mode Bagatelle’s pattern] so I can change the look of my Regency dress. But I’m puzzled about what kind of buttons should close the front. I have some small mother-of-pearl two-hole buttons – would those work? Or should I do self-fabric buttons, and if so – how??
Once this is done I’ll start working on my drop-front Regency dress with your tutorial – thanks in advance for all the GREAT advice! La Mode Bag was a lot more of a challenge than I expected…

]]>